Foton Tunland vs Ford Ranger
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Foton Tunland
From $39,990
Ute
Diesel
Turbo-diesel mild hybrid
120kW
8.1 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Ford Ranger
From $37,130
Ute
Diesel
Diesel Turbo
125kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Track the Foton Tunland & Ford Ranger
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Foton Tunland starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Ford Ranger opens at $37,130. That makes the Ford Ranger the more affordable entry point by $2,860.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $40,843 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Ranger by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Foton Tunland features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford Ranger gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Foton Tunland stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Ranger. The Ford Ranger counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Foton Tunland gets leatherette upholstery while the Ford Ranger offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Foton Tunland uses a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid producing 120kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.
The Ford Ranger responds with a Diesel Turbo making 125kW and 405Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The Ford Ranger has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Ford Ranger is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Foton Tunland measures 5,617mm long on a 3,355mm wheelbase, 392mm longer than the Ford Ranger at 5,225mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Ford Ranger leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.9m to 13.5m
Based on 13.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Foton Tunland and $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.
Warranty: 7 years (Foton Tunland) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger). The Foton Tunland has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Foton Tunland)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Foton Tunland if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Ranger takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. The Foton Tunland adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Foton Tunland and Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Foton Tunland by $2,860.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Ranger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Foton Tunland, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Foton Tunland has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Foton Tunland has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Ranger makes the most power at 125kW. The Ford Ranger is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
