CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›GWM Haval H6 vs Mitsubishi ASX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Haval H6 vs Mitsubishi ASX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 7 Sep 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
GWM Haval H6Ultra Hybrid9?03
Mitsubishi ASXLS7?05

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecGWMMitsubishi
Price (RRP)TBC$37,740
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no price to build from against the Mitsubishi ASX

$37,740RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power179kW113kW
0-100 km/h—11.9s
Fuel Economy5.2 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot (seats up)560L484L
Towing1,500kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars4 Stars

Track the GWM Haval H6 & Mitsubishi ASX

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

The GWM Haval H6 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Mitsubishi ASX. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the GWM Haval H6 and 76% for the Mitsubishi ASX.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM Haval H6, against 5 on the Mitsubishi ASX.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Haval H6 and 7 in the Mitsubishi ASX.

Recalls on our record

GWM Haval H6

None open on our record

Mitsubishi ASX

  • REC-005777 · published 13 Sep 2023Incorrect compliance and data labels are fitted on the left and right hand front door openings.Year range on the notice: 2018
  • REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
  • REC-001056 · published 25 Jan 2021Failure of the anti-rust coating (Fluorine) may allow rust to form on the parking brake shaft.Year range on the notice: 2016
  • 16 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Haval H6 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi ASX gets a 10.4-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval H6 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GWM Haval H6 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi ASX offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the GWM Haval H6 and 1-zone in the Mitsubishi ASX.

Drivetrain

The GWM Haval H6 uses a Petrol producing 179kW and 530Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout.

The Mitsubishi ASX responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.

The GWM Haval H6 has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 113kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Haval H6 measures 4,703mm long on a 2,738mm wheelbase, 465mm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX at 4,238mm (2,639mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 560L in the GWM Haval H6 and 484L in the Mitsubishi ASX, giving the GWM Haval H6 a 76L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Haval H6 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.9m

TightestMitsubishi ASX LSTightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1mTighter
Best
GWM Haval H6 Ultra Hybrid
11.9m
Worst
GWM Haval H6 Ultra Hybrid
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi ASXTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
GWM Haval H611.9 m
Average△ 3-point
Mitsubishi ASXTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,482/year for the GWM Haval H6 and $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H6.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Haval H6 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

GWM Haval H6: Top CarSorted Score, 77 vs 74

The GWM Haval H6 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (77 vs 74), taking 5 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: performance (GWM Haval H6 ahead by 21), value (Mitsubishi ASX ahead by 15), fuel economy (GWM Haval H6 ahead by 11). The GWM Haval H6 will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H6 has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H6 and Mitsubishi ASX?

The Mitsubishi ASX is the cheapest at $37,740 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Haval H6 uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The GWM Haval H6 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Haval H6 has the largest boot at 560L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Haval H6 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Haval H6 makes the most power at 179kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs