CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Haval H6GT vs Renault Megane E-Tech
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Haval H6GT vs Renault Megane E-Tech

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMRenault
Price (RRP)$44,990$54,990
Range (WLTP)440km
Battery60 kWh
Power179kW160kW
0-100 km/h8.5s7.4s
Max DC Charge130kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km
Boot Space471L440L
Towing2,000kg1,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GWM Haval H6GT starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Renault Megane E-Tech opens at $54,990. That makes the GWM Haval H6GT the more affordable entry point by $10,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $60,489 respectively.

The Renault Megane E-Tech qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Haval H6GT, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Haval H6GT and Renault Megane E-Tech hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the GWM Haval H6GT and 85% for the Renault Megane E-Tech.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT and 6 in the Renault Megane E-Tech.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Haval H6GT features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Renault Megane E-Tech gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval H6GT stands out with heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Renault Megane E-Tech. The Renault Megane E-Tech counters with BOSE audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Haval H6GT uses a Petrol producing 179kW and 380Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Renault Megane E-Tech responds with a Electric making 160kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The GWM Haval H6GT has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 160kW. In the real-world sprint, the Renault Megane E-Tech is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Haval H6GT measures 4,727mm long on a 2,738mm wheelbase, 527mm longer than the Renault Megane E-Tech at 4,200mm (2,685mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6GT generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 471L in the GWM Haval H6GT and 440L in the Renault Megane E-Tech, giving the GWM Haval H6GT a 31L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Haval H6GT leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 12.0m

Renault Megane E-Tech Techno
10.8mTighter
Best
GWM Haval H6GT Ultra
12.0m
Worst
GWM Haval H6GT
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Renault Megane E-Tech
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Megane E-Tech). The GWM Haval H6GT has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Megane E-Tech if: You or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Haval H6GT takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H6GT has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6GT adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H6GT and Renault Megane E-Tech?

The GWM Haval H6GT is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Renault Megane E-Tech by $10,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Haval H6GT uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Haval H6GT and Renault Megane E-Tech all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Haval H6GT has the largest boot at 471L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Haval H6GT has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Haval H6GT has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Haval H6GT makes the most power at 179kW. The Renault Megane E-Tech is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs