GWM Haval H8 vs Ford Everest
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
GWM Haval H8: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, 0-100km/h and ground clearance, plus 3 others.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the GWM Haval H8 & Ford Everest
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H8 features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Everest gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments.
The GWM Haval H8 stands out with ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H8 lines up producing 160kW and 324Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a AWD layout.
The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 160kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H8 measures 4,806mm long on a 2,915mm wheelbase, 172mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H8 generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m diameter
Average
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,620/year for the GWM Haval H8 and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $1,197 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.
Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (GWM Haval H8) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H8 if: You or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Everest takes 2 of 2 key spec categories. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $1,197 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H8 and Ford Everest?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for GWM Haval H8, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
