CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Holden Colorado vs Mazda BT-50
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Holden Colorado vs Mazda BT-50

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 29 Aug 2026, price 4 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Holden ColoradoLTZ+ 4x4 Crew Cab1?011
Mazda BT-50XS SC 4x26?06

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Holden Colorado: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecHoldenMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$38,400
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no option data for this car

$38,400RRP

  • with the Holden Colorado's standard kit: $38,400 (nothing to add)

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power147kW120kW
Fuel Economy—6.9 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Holden Colorado & Mazda BT-50

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Holden Colorado and Mazda BT-50 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 4 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Mazda BT-50, against 0 on the Holden Colorado.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 7 in the Holden Colorado and 6 in the Mazda BT-50.

Recalls on our record

Holden Colorado

  • REC-000495 · published 5 Sep 2016The bolt that holds the front seat belt retractor into the body of the vehicle may not have been correctly tightened during manufacture.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-000538 · published 7 Jul 2015A bolt that is one of two fasteners securing the anchor bracket for the rear seatbelt buckles may not have been fitted during vehicle production.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-000537 · published 23 Apr 2015The Alternator B+ Electrical Cable may have been assembled in contact with a steel bracket at the battery tray.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range

Mazda BT-50

  • REC-006284 · published 3 Mar 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left leaf spring bracket may have been insufficiently welded and could crack resulting in a loss of vehicle control.Year range on the notice: 2024
  • REC-005070 · published 10 Mar 2022Due to a manufacturing issue, the transfer case blanking plug may not have been installed correctly during production.Year range on the notice: 2021
  • REC-000899 · published 20 Jan 2021The rear seat belt pretensioner connector lock, may not have been installed correctly during vehicle assembly and will not tension properly.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
  • 11 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Holden Colorado lines up producing 147kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Holden Colorado has the clear power advantage at 147kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Holden Colorado measures 5,361mm long on a 3,096mm wheelbase, 41mm longer than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda BT-50 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 12.7m

TightestMazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2Tightest turn at 12.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5mTighter
Best
Holden Colorado LTZ+ 4x4 Crew Cab
12.7m
Worst
Holden Colorado LTZ+ 4x4 Crew Cab
12.7m · Large

Based on 12.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda BT-50Tightest turn at 12.5m, needs the least road to swing around
Holden Colorado12.7 m
Large△ 3-point
Mazda BT-50Tightest12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Holden Colorado) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Holden Colorado if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Holden's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (51 vs 70). The Holden Colorado and Mazda BT-50 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Holden Colorado and Mazda BT-50?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $38,400 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Holden Colorado and Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Holden Colorado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Holden Colorado makes the most power at 147kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia