CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai i30 Sedan vs Mazda CX-30
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai i30 Sedan vs Mazda CX-30

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiMazda
Price (RRP)$29,250$29,990
Power117kW114kW
0-100 km/h9.4s10.9s
Fuel Economy7 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space474L350L
Towing1,200kg1,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai i30 Sedan starts from $29,250 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-30 opens at $29,990. That makes the Hyundai i30 Sedan the more affordable entry point by $740.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,175 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-30 by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Hyundai i30 Sedan and Mazda CX-30 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 71% for the Hyundai i30 Sedan and 99% for the Mazda CX-30.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-30 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Hyundai i30 Sedan and 6 in the Mazda CX-30.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai i30 Sedan features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-30 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Hyundai i30 Sedan gets leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-30 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai i30 Sedan uses a Petrol producing 117kW and 191Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the clear power advantage at 117kW vs 114kW. In the real-world sprint, the Hyundai i30 Sedan is 1.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai i30 Sedan measures 4,650mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 255mm longer than the Mazda CX-30 at 4,395mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i30 Sedan generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 474L in the Hyundai i30 Sedan and 350L in the Mazda CX-30, giving the Hyundai i30 Sedan a 124L advantage.

For towing, the Hyundai i30 Sedan leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m
Best
Hyundai i30 Sedan
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-30
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,995/year for the Hyundai i30 Sedan and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.

Estimated annual total: $1,995 (Hyundai i30 Sedan) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-30). The Mazda CX-30 saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Sedan) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai i30 Sedan if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Hyundai i30 Sedan takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai i30 Sedan has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai i30 Sedan and Mazda CX-30?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan is the cheapest at $29,250 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-30 by $740.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai i30 Sedan and Mazda CX-30 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the largest boot at 474L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan makes the most power at 117kW. The Hyundai i30 Sedan is quickest to 100km/h in 9.4s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · All SUVs