Hyundai iLoad vs Mitsubishi Express
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Vans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Hyundai iLoad
Price TBC
Van
Diesel
—
125kW
8.5 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
2511L
Mitsubishi Express
From $43,490
Van
Diesel
Diesel
110kW
7.2 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
5200L
Track the Hyundai iLoad & Mitsubishi Express
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
Drivetrain
The Hyundai iLoad lines up producing 125kW and 392Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a RWD layout.
The Mitsubishi Express responds with a Diesel making 110kW and 340Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.6 seconds.
The Hyundai iLoad has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Hyundai iLoad measures 5,125mm long on a 3,200mm wheelbase, 126mm longer than the Mitsubishi Express at 4,999mm (3,098mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai iLoad generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 2511L in the Hyundai iLoad and 5200L in the Mitsubishi Express, giving the Mitsubishi Express a 2689L advantage. The Hyundai iLoad seats 6 vs 2.
For towing, the Hyundai iLoad leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m diameter
Average
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.4 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m — clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m — 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide — fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m — swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m — no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Hyundai iLoad and $2,052/year for the Mitsubishi Express. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Express.
Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Hyundai iLoad) vs $2,052 (Mitsubishi Express). The Mitsubishi Express saves you roughly $371 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 160,000km (Hyundai iLoad) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Express). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Hyundai iLoad if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Express if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Hyundai iLoad and Mitsubishi Express trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mitsubishi Express will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Express has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Hyundai iLoad and Mitsubishi Express?
The Mitsubishi Express is the cheapest at $43,490 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Express uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Express all hold a 0-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mitsubishi Express has the largest boot at 5200L.
Which can tow the most?
The Hyundai iLoad has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Hyundai iLoad makes the most power at 125kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
