CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Kona Electric vs BYD Atto 3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Kona Electric vs BYD Atto 3

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiBYD
Price (RRP)$54,000$39,990
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)370km345km
Battery48.6 kWh49.9 kWh
Power99kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.9s7.9s
Max DC Charge100kW70kW
10-80% Charge Time47 min46 min
Boot Space407L440L
Towing750kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited6yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars
V2LYes (3.6kW)Yes

Track the Hyundai Kona Electric & BYD Atto 3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Kona Electric starts from $54,000 before on-road costs, while the BYD Atto 3 opens at $39,990. That makes the BYD Atto 3 the more affordable entry point by $14,010.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,400 and $43,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

The BYD Atto 3 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Hyundai Kona Electric. Adult occupant protection scored 80% for the Hyundai Kona Electric and 91% for the BYD Atto 3.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the BYD Atto 3, against 5 on the Hyundai Kona Electric.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 7 in the BYD Atto 3.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

64.8kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 2m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 100kW · 0–80%

39 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 100kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

49.9kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

48 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 70kW · 0–80%

43 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 70kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Kona Electric features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BYD Atto 3 gets a 12.8-inch display and 5-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai Kona Electric stands out with wireless charging and heated front seats that you will not find on the BYD Atto 3. The BYD Atto 3 counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Hyundai Kona Electric gets cloth upholstery while the BYD Atto 3 offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 1-zone in the BYD Atto 3.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Kona Electric uses a Electric producing 99kW and 255Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The BYD Atto 3 responds with a Electric making 150kW and 310Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The BYD Atto 3 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 99kW. In the real-world sprint, the BYD Atto 3 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 48.6kWh (Hyundai Kona Electric) vs 49.9kWh (BYD Atto 3), giving WLTP ranges of 370km and 345km. DC fast charging peaks at 100kW (Hyundai Kona Electric) vs 70kW (BYD Atto 3).

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Kona Electric measures 4,350mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 105mm shorter than the BYD Atto 3 at 4,455mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Atto 3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 407L in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 440L in the BYD Atto 3, giving the BYD Atto 3 a 33L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

TightestHyundai Kona Electric Standard Range 99kWTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai Kona Electric Standard Range 99kW
10.6mTighter
Best
BYD Atto 3 Essential
11.0m
Worst
Hyundai Kona Electric Standard Range 99kW
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BYD Atto 3 Essential
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai Kona ElectricTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai Kona ElectricTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
BYD Atto 311.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona Electric) vs 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Atto 3). The BYD Atto 3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Kona Electric if: You or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BYD Atto 3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BYD Atto 3 takes 8 of 10 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the BYD Atto 3 has a clear edge. The BYD Atto 3 adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona Electric and BYD Atto 3?

The BYD Atto 3 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Kona Electric by $14,010.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Hyundai Kona Electric has the most range at 370km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Hyundai Kona Electric accepts the highest DC charging at up to 100kW.

Which is safest?

The BYD Atto 3 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The BYD Atto 3 has the largest boot at 440L.

Which has the best warranty?

The BYD Atto 3 has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Atto 3 makes the most power at 150kW. The BYD Atto 3 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs