Hyundai Kona vs Chery Tiggo 7
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Hyundai Kona: we're still completing kerb weight, seat count, 0-100km/h and warranty.
Chery Tiggo 7: we're still completing kerb weight, 0-100km/h, ground clearance, turning circle and braked towing.
Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Hyundai Kona & Chery Tiggo 7
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Hyundai Kona starts from $26,600 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 opens at $27,500. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $900.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $29,260 and $30,250 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Hyundai Kona by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Hyundai Kona features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Chery Tiggo 7 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Hyundai Kona stands out with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 7. The Chery Tiggo 7 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Hyundai Kona lines up producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a smartstream intelligent variable transmission (ivt) with sequential manual mode to a FWD layout.
The Chery Tiggo 7 responds with a 1.5L Turbo Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a 6 speed dual clutch transmission driving the rear wheels.
The Hyundai Kona has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 108kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Hyundai Kona measures 4,205mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 335mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 7 at 4,540mm (2,661mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 generally means more rear legroom.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m diameter
Good
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.4 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Hyundai Kona and $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai Kona.
Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Hyundai Kona) vs $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7). The Hyundai Kona saves you roughly $200 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Hyundai Kona takes 3 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Hyundai Kona will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona and Chery Tiggo 7?
The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $26,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 7 by $900.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Hyundai Kona uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 7 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Hyundai Kona has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Hyundai Kona makes the most power at 110kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
