Hyundai Kona vs GWM Haval H6
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Hyundai Kona & GWM Haval H6
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Hyundai Kona starts from $33,700 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval H6 opens at $35,990. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $2,290.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,070 and $39,589 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Hyundai Kona by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The GWM Haval H6 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Hyundai Kona. Adult occupant protection scored 80% for the Hyundai Kona and 88% for the GWM Haval H6.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM Haval H6, against 4 on the Hyundai Kona.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Hyundai Kona and 6 in the GWM Haval H6.
Feature Showdown
The Hyundai Kona features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the GWM Haval H6 gets a 14.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Hyundai Kona stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the GWM Haval H6. The GWM Haval H6 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Hyundai Kona uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6 responds with a Petrol making 170kW and 380Nm, paired to a 9-speed dual clutch transmission driving the front wheels.
The GWM Haval H6 has the clear power advantage at 170kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Hyundai Kona measures 4,350mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 353mm shorter than the GWM Haval H6 at 4,703mm (2,738mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 361L in the Hyundai Kona and 560L in the GWM Haval H6, giving the GWM Haval H6 a 199L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Haval H6 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.9m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona and $2,109/year for the GWM Haval H6. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai Kona.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6). The GWM Haval H6 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Haval H6 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Haval H6 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Hyundai Kona will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H6 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona and GWM Haval H6?
The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $33,700 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H6 by $2,290.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Hyundai Kona uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The GWM Haval H6 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Haval H6 has the largest boot at 560L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H6 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H6 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Haval H6 makes the most power at 170kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
