CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Tucson vs Suzuki Fronx
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Tucson vs Suzuki Fronx

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiSuzuki
Price (RRP)$29,290$28,490
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power122kW75.8kW
0-100 km/h11.5s
Fuel Economy7.8 L/100km4.9 L/100km
Boot Space488L304L
Towing1,600kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars1 Stars

Track the Hyundai Tucson & Suzuki Fronx

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Tucson starts from $29,290 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $800.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,219 and $31,339 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $4,130 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Hyundai Tucson holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 1 stars for the Suzuki Fronx.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Fronx packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Hyundai Tucson.

Both include the essentials: lane keep assist, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Hyundai Tucson and 6 in the Suzuki Fronx.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Tucson features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 3.5-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Tucson uses a In-line 4 cyl. Nu 2.0L GDi (Gasoline Direct Injection), 16-valve DOHC (HLA), 2-step variable induction system producing 122kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a FWD layout.

The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 75.8kW and 137Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The Hyundai Tucson has the clear power advantage at 122kW vs 75.8kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Tucson measures 4,480mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 485mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Tucson generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 488L in the Hyundai Tucson and 304L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the Hyundai Tucson a 184L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.0m

TightestSuzuki Fronx GLTightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Fronx GL
10.4mTighter
Best
Hyundai Tucson Active 2.0 GDi 2WD Manual
11.0m
Worst
Hyundai Tucson Active 2.0 GDi 2WD Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Fronx GL
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki FronxTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai Tucson11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki FronxTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,223/year for the Hyundai Tucson and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $826 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.

Estimated annual total: $2,223 (Hyundai Tucson) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Fronx). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $826 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Tucson) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The Hyundai Tucson has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Tucson if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Hyundai Tucson takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $826 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai Tucson has a clear edge. The Hyundai Tucson adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Tucson and Suzuki Fronx?

The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Tucson by $800.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Hyundai Tucson has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai Tucson has the largest boot at 488L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai Tucson has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Hyundai Tucson has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai Tucson makes the most power at 122kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars