CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Tucson vs Suzuki Vitara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Tucson vs Suzuki Vitara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiSuzuki
Price (RRP)$38,900$38,490
Power115kW95kW
0-100 km/h9.2s10.2s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km5.8 L/100km
Boot Space539L375L
Towing1,650kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Tucson starts from $38,900 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Vitara opens at $38,490. That makes the Suzuki Vitara the more affordable entry point by $410.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,790 and $42,339 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Vitara by roughly $3,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Hyundai Tucson and Suzuki Vitara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Hyundai Tucson and 77% for the Suzuki Vitara.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Vitara packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Hyundai Tucson.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Tucson features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Vitara gets a 9-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai Tucson stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Suzuki Vitara. The Suzuki Vitara counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Hyundai Tucson gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Vitara offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Hyundai Tucson and 1-zone in the Suzuki Vitara.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Tucson uses a Petrol producing 115kW and 192Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.2 seconds.

The Suzuki Vitara responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Hyundai Tucson has the clear power advantage at 115kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Hyundai Tucson is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Tucson measures 4,640mm long on a 2,755mm wheelbase, 465mm longer than the Suzuki Vitara at 4,175mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Tucson generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 539L in the Hyundai Tucson and 375L in the Suzuki Vitara, giving the Hyundai Tucson a 164L advantage.

For towing, the Hyundai Tucson leads with a 1,650kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 11.8m

Suzuki Vitara GLX Turbo
10.2mTighter
Best
Hyundai Tucson Active Petrol
11.8m
Worst
Hyundai Tucson
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Vitara
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Hyundai Tucson and $1,653/year for the Suzuki Vitara. That is a $656 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Vitara.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Hyundai Tucson) vs $1,653 (Suzuki Vitara). The Suzuki Vitara saves you roughly $656 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Hyundai Tucson) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Vitara). The Hyundai Tucson has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Tucson if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Vitara if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Hyundai Tucson takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Vitara will save you roughly $656 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai Tucson has a clear edge. The Hyundai Tucson adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Tucson and Suzuki Vitara?

The Suzuki Vitara is the cheapest at $38,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Tucson by $410.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Vitara uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai Tucson and Suzuki Vitara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai Tucson has the largest boot at 539L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai Tucson has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,650kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Hyundai Tucson has the longest warranty at 5 years.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai Tucson makes the most power at 115kW. The Hyundai Tucson is quickest to 100km/h in 9.2s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs