CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu D-Max vs Foton Tunland
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu D-Max vs Foton Tunland

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuFoton
Price (RRP)$41,243$39,990
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW120kW
0-100 km/h10.5s11s
10-80% Charge Time45 min
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km8 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Isuzu D-Max & Foton Tunland

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu D-Max starts from $41,243 before on-road costs, while the Foton Tunland opens at $39,990. That makes the Foton Tunland the more affordable entry point by $1,253.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $45,367 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Isuzu D-Max by roughly $1,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu D-Max features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Foton Tunland gets a 10.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Isuzu D-Max gets cloth upholstery while the Foton Tunland offers leatherette.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu D-Max uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Foton Tunland responds with a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid making 120kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Isuzu D-Max is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu D-Max measures 5,340mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 277mm shorter than the Foton Tunland at 5,617mm (3,355mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Foton Tunland leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 13.5m

TightestIsuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2Tightest turn at 12.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5mTighter
Best
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m
Worst
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestIsuzu D-MaxTightest turn at 12.5m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu D-MaxTightest12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Foton Tunland13.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Isuzu D-Max and $2,280/year for the Foton Tunland. That is a $313 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu D-Max.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Isuzu D-Max) vs $2,280 (Foton Tunland). The Isuzu D-Max saves you roughly $313 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu D-Max) vs 7 years (Foton Tunland). The Foton Tunland has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Foton Tunland).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu D-Max if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Foton Tunland if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Isuzu D-Max and Foton Tunland trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Isuzu D-Max will save you roughly $313 a year in fuel. The Foton Tunland adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu D-Max and Foton Tunland?

The Foton Tunland is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Isuzu D-Max by $1,253.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu D-Max uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu D-Max all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu D-Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Foton Tunland has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia