CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Mitsubishi Pajero
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Mitsubishi Pajero

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$43,900TBC
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW141kW
0-100 km/h11s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km9.1 L/100km
Boot Space311L1069L
Towing3,500kg3,000kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Isuzu MU-X & Mitsubishi Pajero

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu MU-X and Mitsubishi Pajero hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Isuzu MU-X packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mitsubishi Pajero.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Isuzu MU-X and 6 in the Mitsubishi Pajero.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Pajero gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Isuzu MU-X stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Isuzu MU-X gets cloth upholstery while the Mitsubishi Pajero offers fabric. Climate control is 2-zone in the Isuzu MU-X and 1-zone in the Mitsubishi Pajero.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Pajero responds with a 3.2L 4M41 DID Turbo Diesel making 141kW and 441Nm, paired to a 5-speed automatic (invecs-ii sports mode) driving all four wheels.

The Mitsubishi Pajero has the clear power advantage at 141kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 40mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero at 4,900mm (2,780mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 1069L in the Mitsubishi Pajero, giving the Mitsubishi Pajero a 758L advantage.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.6m

TightestMitsubishi Pajero GLX 4WD AutoTightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Pajero GLX 4WD Auto
11.4mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Pajero GLX 4WD Auto
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi PajeroTightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu MU-X11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Mitsubishi PajeroTightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $2,594/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero. That is a $770 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X) vs $2,594 (Mitsubishi Pajero). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $770 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero). The Mitsubishi Pajero has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —10yr (Mitsubishi Pajero).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Pajero takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $770 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Pajero has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Mitsubishi Pajero?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu MU-X and Mitsubishi Pajero all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Pajero has the largest boot at 1069L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Pajero has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Pajero makes the most power at 141kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs