CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Subaru XV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Subaru XV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuSubaru
Price (RRP)$43,900TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power120kW110kW
0-100 km/h11s10.7s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km7 L/100km
Boot Space311L310L
Towing3,500kg1,400kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Isuzu MU-X & Subaru XV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu MU-X and Subaru XV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Isuzu MU-X packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Subaru XV.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Isuzu MU-X stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Subaru XV. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Subaru XV responds with a 2.0-litre DOHC Dual AVCS Boxer petrol making 110kW and 196Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.7 seconds.

The Isuzu MU-X has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Subaru XV is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 410mm longer than the Subaru XV at 4,450mm (2,635mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 310L in the Subaru XV, giving the Isuzu MU-X a 1L advantage. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,400kg. That 2,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.6m

TightestSubaru XV 2.0i (GP)Tightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Subaru XV 2.0i (GP)
10.6mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru XV 2.0i (GP)
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSubaru XVTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu MU-X11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Subaru XVTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $1,995/year for the Subaru XV. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X) vs $1,995 (Subaru XV). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru XV if: You or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Subaru XV?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu MU-X and Subaru XV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Isuzu MU-X has the largest boot at 311L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Isuzu MU-X makes the most power at 120kW. The Subaru XV is quickest to 100km/h in 10.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs