CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu NLR 45-150 vs Skoda Kodiaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu NLR 45-150 vs Skoda Kodiaq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuSkoda
Price (RRP)$52,900$54,990
Power110kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.1s
Fuel Economy10.5 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space270L
Towing4,000kg2,000kg
Warranty6yr / 250k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu NLR 45-150 starts from $52,900 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. That makes the Isuzu NLR 45-150 the more affordable entry point by $2,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,190 and $60,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kodiaq by roughly $5,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu NLR 45-150 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Isuzu NLR 45-150 stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. The Skoda Kodiaq counters with heated front seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu NLR 45-150 uses a Diesel producing 110kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a RWD layout.

The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu NLR 45-150 measures 4,735mm long on a 2,490mm wheelbase, 23mm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Isuzu NLR 45-150 leads with a 4,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 11.4m

Isuzu NLR 45-150 Cab Chassis MT SWB
9.8mTighter
Best
Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4m
Worst
Isuzu NLR 45-150
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,993/year for the Isuzu NLR 45-150 and $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq. That is a $1,169 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kodiaq.

Estimated annual total: $2,993 (Isuzu NLR 45-150) vs $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq saves you roughly $1,169 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 250,000km (Isuzu NLR 45-150) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu NLR 45-150 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Isuzu NLR 45-150 and Skoda Kodiaq trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Skoda Kodiaq will save you roughly $1,169 a year in fuel. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu NLR 45-150 and Skoda Kodiaq?

The Isuzu NLR 45-150 is the cheapest at $52,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $2,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu NLR 45-150 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Light Trucks · All SUVs