CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJeep Cherokee vs Isuzu MU-X
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Jeep Cherokee vs Isuzu MU-X

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJeepIsuzu
Price (RRP)TBC$43,900
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power200kW120kW
0-100 km/h7.5s11s
Fuel Economy9.8 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space311L
Towing2,200kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 100k km6yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Jeep Cherokee & Isuzu MU-X

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Jeep Cherokee and Isuzu MU-X hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Isuzu MU-X packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Jeep Cherokee.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The Jeep Cherokee features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Isuzu MU-X gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Jeep Cherokee stands out with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate that you will not find on the Isuzu MU-X. The Isuzu MU-X counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Jeep Cherokee uses a 3.2L Pentastar V6 producing 200kW and 315Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.

The Isuzu MU-X responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11 seconds.

The Jeep Cherokee has the clear power advantage at 200kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Jeep Cherokee is 3.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Jeep Cherokee measures 4,651mm long on a 2,707mm wheelbase, 209mm shorter than the Isuzu MU-X at 4,860mm (2,855mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,200kg. That 1,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.6m

TightestJeep Cherokee LongitudeTightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Jeep Cherokee Longitude
11.6mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Best
Jeep Cherokee Longitude
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestJeep CherokeeTightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Jeep CherokeeTightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Isuzu MU-X11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,793/year for the Jeep Cherokee and $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X. That is a $969 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $2,793 (Jeep Cherokee) vs $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $969 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Cherokee) vs 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Jeep Cherokee if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $969 a year in fuel. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Jeep Cherokee and Isuzu MU-X?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Jeep Cherokee and Isuzu MU-X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Jeep Cherokee makes the most power at 200kW. The Jeep Cherokee is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs