CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Musso EV vs Mazda BT-50
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso EV vs Mazda BT-50

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMMazda
Price (RRP)$60,000$36,400
Range (WLTP)420km
Battery80.6 kWh
Power152kW120kW
0-100 km/h10.9s10.9s
Max DC Charge300kW
10-80% Charge Time36 min
Fuel Economy7.1 L/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing1,800kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The KGM Musso EV starts from $60,000 before on-road costs, while the Mazda BT-50 opens at $36,400. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $23,600.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $66,000 and $40,040 respectively.

The KGM Musso EV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda BT-50, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Musso EV and Mazda BT-50 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The KGM Musso EV packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Mazda BT-50.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the KGM Musso EV and 6 in the Mazda BT-50. The KGM Musso EV adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda BT-50 misses.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso EV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda BT-50 gets a 7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Musso EV stands out with heated front seats, ventilated seats, V2L and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda BT-50. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso EV gets leather upholstery while the Mazda BT-50 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the KGM Musso EV and 1-zone in the Mazda BT-50.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso EV uses a Electric producing 152kW and 339Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV has the clear power advantage at 152kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso EV measures 5,160mm long on a 3,150mm wheelbase, 160mm shorter than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 12.5m

KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2mTighter
Best
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m
Worst
KGM Musso EV
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda BT-50
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). The KGM Musso EV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso EV takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The KGM Musso EV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Musso EV and Mazda BT-50?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Musso EV by $23,600.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Musso EV and Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso EV has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso EV makes the most power at 152kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes