CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›KGM Musso EV vs Nissan Navara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso EV vs Nissan Navara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 23 Oct 2026, price 23 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
KGM Musso EVAWD9?03
Nissan NavaraSL11?01

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecKGMNissan
Price (RRP)TBC$53,348
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no price to build from against the Nissan Navara

$53,348RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeElectricDiesel
Range (WLTP)380km—
Battery80.6 kWh—
Power266kW150kW
0-100 km/h10.9s—
Max DC Charge300kW—
10-80% Charge Time46 min—
Fuel Economy—7.7 L/100km
Boot (seats up)532L—
Towing1,800kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / No data
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Track the KGM Musso EV & Nissan Navara

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

KGM Musso EV

None open on our record

Nissan Navara

  • REC-001598 · published 7 May 2021The child restraint system (CRS) top tethers may not be strong enough to keep a child seat securely fastened and may break during an accident.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
  • REC-001113 · published 25 Oct 2018An internal ignition switch spring may have been manufactured with a surface defect.Year range on the notice: 2016 - 2017
  • REC-001101 · published 8 Aug 2016In the rear oxygen sensor electrical short-to-ground or short-to-battery, the sensor fails, but a Malfunction Indicator Light (MIL) or Engine Light warning does not illuminate.Year range on the notice: 2014 - 2016
  • 3 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

80.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 17m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

16 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso EV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Nissan Navara gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Musso EV stands out with heated front seats, ventilated seats, V2L and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Nissan Navara. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso EV gets leather upholstery while the Nissan Navara offers fabric. Climate control is 2-zone in the KGM Musso EV and 1-zone in the Nissan Navara.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso EV uses a Electric producing 266kW and 630Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Nissan Navara responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The KGM Musso EV has the clear power advantage at 266kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso EV measures 5,160mm long on a 3,150mm wheelbase, 160mm shorter than the Nissan Navara at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Nissan Navara leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 12.7m

TightestKGM Musso EV AWDTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso EV AWD
12.2mTighter
Best
Nissan Navara SL
12.7m
Worst
KGM Musso EV AWD
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan Navara SL
12.7m · Large

Based on 12.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM Musso EVTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM Musso EVTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Nissan Navara12.7 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV) vs 5 years (Nissan Navara). The KGM Musso EV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan Navara if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Nissan Navara: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 67

The Nissan Navara comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 67), taking 1 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Nissan Navara ahead by 25), fuel economy (Nissan Navara ahead by 21), performance (KGM Musso EV ahead by 10). The KGM Musso EV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Musso EV and Nissan Navara?

The Nissan Navara is the cheapest at $53,348 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan Navara uses the least fuel at 7.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Nissan Navara holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Musso EV, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan Navara has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso EV has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso EV makes the most power at 266kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia