CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Torres vs GWM Haval H7
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs GWM Haval H7

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMGWM
Price (RRP)$34,990$46,990
Power120kW179kW
0-100 km/h11.8s7.9s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space455L520L
Towing1,500kg2,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval H7 opens at $46,990. That makes the KGM Torres the more affordable entry point by $12,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $51,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H7 by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Torres and GWM Haval H7 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H7 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the KGM Torres.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the KGM Torres and 6 in the GWM Haval H7. The GWM Haval H7 adds a 360-degree camera that the KGM Torres misses.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Haval H7 gets a 14.6-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting that you will not find on the GWM Haval H7. The GWM Haval H7 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The GWM Haval H7 responds with a Petrol making 179kW and 530Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The GWM Haval H7 has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval H7 is 3.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 60mm shorter than the GWM Haval H7 at 4,760mm (2,800mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H7 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 520L in the GWM Haval H7, giving the GWM Haval H7 a 65L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Haval H7 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 12.0m

KGM Torres ELX
11.2mTighter
Best
GWM Haval H7 Vanta HEV
12.0m
Worst
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Haval H7
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $1,682/year for the GWM Haval H7. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H7.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $1,682 (GWM Haval H7). The GWM Haval H7 saves you roughly $570 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H7). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Haval H7 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Haval H7 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories. The GWM Haval H7 will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H7 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and GWM Haval H7?

The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H7 by $12,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Haval H7 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Torres and GWM Haval H7 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Haval H7 has the largest boot at 520L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Haval H7 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Haval H7 makes the most power at 179kW. The GWM Haval H7 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs