CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLand Rover Freelander 2 vs Toyota Yaris Cross
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Land Rover Freelander 2 vs Toyota Yaris Cross

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Land Rover Freelander 2: we're still completing price, width, kerb weight, warranty and braked towing.

Toyota Yaris Cross: we're still completing kerb weight, 0-100km/h, warranty, ground clearance and turning circle.

Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecLand RoverToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$26,990
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power110kW88kW
0-100 km/h11.7s
Fuel Economy6.2 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space390L
Towing1,250kg
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Land Rover Freelander 2 & Toyota Yaris Cross

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Yaris Cross counters with Apple CarPlay that the Land Rover Freelander 2 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Freelander 2 gets cloth upholstery while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers fabric.

Drivetrain

The Land Rover Freelander 2 uses a Diesel producing 110kW and 420Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.7 seconds.

The Toyota Yaris Cross responds with a 1.5L 3-cyclinder Petrol making 88kW and 145Nm, paired to a continuously variable transmission (auto cvt) driving the front wheels.

The Land Rover Freelander 2 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 88kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Land Rover Freelander 2 measures 4,500mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 320mm longer than the Toyota Yaris Cross at 4,180mm (2,560mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Freelander 2 generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.3m diameter

Average

Land Rover Freelander 2 TD4 Manual
11.3m
Land Rover Freelander 2 TD4 Manual
11.3m · Average

Based on 11.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.3 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Land Rover Freelander 2 Turning circle · Ø 11.3 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Land Rover Freelander 2 and $1,539/year for the Toyota Yaris Cross. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Yaris Cross.

Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Land Rover Freelander 2) vs $1,539 (Toyota Yaris Cross). The Toyota Yaris Cross saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Land Rover Freelander 2 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Yaris Cross if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Land Rover Freelander 2 and Toyota Yaris Cross trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota Yaris Cross will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Land Rover Freelander 2 and Toyota Yaris Cross?

The Toyota Yaris Cross is the cheapest at $26,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Yaris Cross uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota Yaris Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Yaris Cross has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,250kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Freelander 2 makes the most power at 110kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs