CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLexus LM vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Lexus LM vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance: we're still completing braked towing, electric range and energy consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecLexusMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$160,888$189,900
Fuel typeHybridPlug-in Hybrid
Battery6.1 kWh
Electric range15km
Power184kW500kW
0-100 km/h9.1s3.4s
Fuel Economy5.5 L/100km6.1 kWh/100km
Boot Space110L280L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Lexus LM & Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Lexus LM starts from $160,888 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance opens at $189,900. That makes the Lexus LM the more affordable entry point by $29,012.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $176,977 and $208,890 respectively.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Lexus LM, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by roughly $6,375 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

6.1kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Lexus LM features a 14-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets a 11.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Lexus LM stands out with wireless charging, Mark Levinson audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance counters with head-up display, panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Lexus LM uses a 2.5L Petrol-Electric Hybrid (A25A-FXS) producing 184kW and 239Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance responds with a Hybrid making 500kW and 1020Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.4 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 184kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 5.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Lexus LM measures 5,130mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 288mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance at 4,842mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Lexus LM generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 110L in the Lexus LM and 280L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance, giving the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance a 170L advantage. The Lexus LM seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 12.1m

TightestLexus LM 350h Sports Luxury (FWD)Tightest turn at 11.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Lexus LM 350h Sports Luxury (FWD)
11.8mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m
Worst
Lexus LM 350h Sports Luxury (FWD)
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestLexus LMTightest turn at 11.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Lexus LMTightest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Lexus LM and $293/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. That is a $1,275 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.

Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Lexus LM) vs $293 (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance saves you roughly $1,275 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Lexus LM) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Lexus LM if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Lexus's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance will save you roughly $1,275 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Lexus LM and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance?

The Lexus LM is the cheapest at $160,888 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by $29,012.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Lexus LM uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Lexus LM and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the largest boot at 280L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · All Sedans · Best hybrid cars · Best electric cars