Lexus LS vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Lexus LS
From $199,850
Sedan
Petrol
3.4L V6 Twin-Turbo Petrol
310kW
10 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
480L
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
From $189,900
Sedan
Plug-in Hybrid
Hybrid
500kW
6.1 kWh/100km
ANCAP: no data
280L
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Lexus LS & Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Lexus LS starts from $199,850 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance opens at $189,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance the more affordable entry point by $9,950.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $219,835 and $208,890 respectively.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Lexus LS, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by roughly $12,785 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
6.1kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Lexus LS features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets a 11.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Lexus LS stands out with wireless charging, Mark Levinson audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance counters with panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Lexus LS gets leather accented upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance offers nappa leather. Climate control is 4-zone in the Lexus LS and 2-zone in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.
Drivetrain
The Lexus LS uses a 3.4L V6 Twin-Turbo Petrol producing 310kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance responds with a Hybrid making 500kW and 1020Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.4 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 310kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Lexus LS measures 5,235mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 393mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance at 4,842mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Lexus LS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 480L in the Lexus LS and 280L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance, giving the Lexus LS a 200L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 12.1m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,850/year for the Lexus LS and $293/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. That is a $2,557 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.
Estimated annual total: $2,850 (Lexus LS) vs $293 (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance saves you roughly $2,557 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years (Lexus LS) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Lexus LS if: You need more boot space, or prefer Lexus's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance will save you roughly $2,557 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Lexus LS has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Lexus LS and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is the cheapest at $189,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Lexus LS by $9,950.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Lexus LS and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Lexus LS has the largest boot at 480L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
