CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda BT-50 vs MG U9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda BT-50 vs MG U9

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaMG
Price (RRP)$36,400$52,990
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW160kW
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda BT-50 & MG U9

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda BT-50 starts from $36,400 before on-road costs, while the MG U9 opens at $52,990. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $16,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,040 and $58,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda BT-50 by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda BT-50 and MG U9 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Mazda BT-50 and 91% for the MG U9.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the MG U9, against 4 on the Mazda BT-50.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda BT-50 and 6 in the MG U9.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda BT-50 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the MG U9 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda BT-50 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the MG U9. The MG U9 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda BT-50 gets cloth upholstery while the MG U9 offers artificial leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Mazda BT-50 and 2-zone in the MG U9.

Drivetrain

The Mazda BT-50 uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The MG U9 responds with a 2.5L Turbo Diesel making 160kW and 520Nm, paired to a zf 8 speed automatic driving the rear wheels.

The MG U9 has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda BT-50 measures 5,320mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 180mm shorter than the MG U9 at 5,500mm (3,300mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG U9 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the MG U9 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 13.3m

TightestMazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2Tightest turn at 12.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5mTighter
Best
MG U9 Explore
13.3m
Worst
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MG U9 Explore
13.3m · Large

Based on 13.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda BT-50Tightest turn at 12.5m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda BT-50Tightest12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
MG U913.3 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50 and $2,252/year for the MG U9. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Mazda BT-50) vs $2,252 (MG U9). The Mazda BT-50 saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50) vs 5 years (MG U9). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG U9 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda BT-50 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda BT-50 and MG U9?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG U9 by $16,590.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda BT-50 and MG U9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG U9 makes the most power at 160kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia