Mazda CX-7 vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda CX-7
Price TBC
SUV
Petrol
2.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT
120kW
9.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
400L
Toyota LandCruiser 300
From $97,990
SUV
Diesel
Diesel Twin-Turbo V6
227kW
8.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
700L
Track the Mazda CX-7 & Toyota LandCruiser 300
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-7 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mazda CX-7.
Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Mazda CX-7 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-7 uses a 2.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT producing 120kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed automatic to a FWD layout.
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-7 measures 4,693mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 287mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 300 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 400L in the Mazda CX-7 and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Toyota LandCruiser 300 a 300L advantage.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 2,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 11.8m
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,679/year for the Mazda CX-7 and $2,537/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Toyota LandCruiser 300.
Estimated annual total: $2,679 (Mazda CX-7) vs $2,537 (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Toyota LandCruiser 300 saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-7 if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 takes 5 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 has a clear edge. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-7 and Toyota LandCruiser 300?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 uses the least fuel at 8.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-7 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the largest boot at 700L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
