CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-7 vs Toyota Yaris Cross
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-7 vs Toyota Yaris Cross

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$31,790
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power120kW85kW
0-100 km/h9.8s
Fuel Economy9.4 L/100km3.8 L/100km
Boot Space400L390L
Towing1,000kg400kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-7 & Toyota Yaris Cross

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-7 and Toyota Yaris Cross hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota Yaris Cross packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mazda CX-7.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Yaris Cross counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Mazda CX-7 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-7 uses a 2.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT producing 120kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota Yaris Cross responds with a 1.5L 3-cyl Hybrid making 85kW and 141Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-7 has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 85kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-7 measures 4,693mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 513mm longer than the Toyota Yaris Cross at 4,180mm (2,560mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-7 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 400L in the Mazda CX-7 and 390L in the Toyota Yaris Cross, giving the Mazda CX-7 a 10L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-7 leads with a 1,000kg braked capacity vs 400kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 11.4m

TightestToyota Yaris Cross GX Hybrid 2WDTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota Yaris Cross GX Hybrid 2WD
9.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-7 Classic
11.4m
Worst
Mazda CX-7 Classic
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Yaris Cross GX Hybrid 2WD
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota Yaris CrossTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-711.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Toyota Yaris CrossTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,679/year for the Mazda CX-7 and $1,083/year for the Toyota Yaris Cross. That is a $1,596 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Yaris Cross.

Estimated annual total: $2,679 (Mazda CX-7) vs $1,083 (Toyota Yaris Cross). The Toyota Yaris Cross saves you roughly $1,596 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Yaris Cross). The Toyota Yaris Cross has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-7 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Yaris Cross if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-7 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota Yaris Cross will save you roughly $1,596 a year in fuel. The Toyota Yaris Cross adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-7 and Toyota Yaris Cross?

The Toyota Yaris Cross is the cheapest at $31,790 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Yaris Cross uses the least fuel at 3.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-7 and Toyota Yaris Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-7 has the largest boot at 400L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-7 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota Yaris Cross has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-7 makes the most power at 120kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars