CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-80 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-80 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaFord
Price (RRP)$64,490$86,990
Range (WLTP)540km
Battery91 kWh
Power209kW198kW
0-100 km/h9s7s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time28 min
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km
Boot Space258L402L
Towing2,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E opens at $86,990. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $22,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $95,689 respectively.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-80, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-80 and Ford Mustang Mach-E hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 92% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-80 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Both include the essentials: lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Ford Mustang Mach-E adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-80 misses.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E counters with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats that the Mazda CX-80 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E responds with a Electric Motor making 198kW and 580Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 198kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 277mm longer than the Ford Mustang Mach-E at 4,713mm (2,984mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E, giving the Ford Mustang Mach-E a 144L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m diameter

Average

Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.6m
Mazda CX-80
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $64,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Mustang Mach-E by $22,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 8.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and Ford Mustang Mach-E all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the largest boot at 402L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs