CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$58,990$58,440
Fuel typePlug-in HybridDiesel
Range (WLTP)84km
Battery22.7 kWh
Electric range86km
Power221kW133kW
0-100 km/h11.5s
Max DC Charge50kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy1.5 kWh/100km8 L/100km
Boot Space494L131L
Towing1,600kg3,100kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV & Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV starts from $58,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport opens at $58,440. That makes the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport the more affordable entry point by $550.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $64,889 and $64,284 respectively.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV by roughly $11,040 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

22.7kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

22 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 50kW · 0–80%

27 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 50kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV stands out with power tailgate and Yamaha audio that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets cloth upholstery while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses a Petrol producing 221kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport responds with a Diesel making 133kW and 430Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the clear power advantage at 221kW vs 133kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV measures 4,720mm long on a 2,704mm wheelbase, 120mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport at 4,840mm (2,800mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 494L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 131L in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV a 363L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1414L vs 1500L. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.2m

TightestMitsubishi Outlander PHEV ESTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV ES
11.2mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLS
11.2m
Best
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV ES
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLS
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi Outlander PHEVTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEVTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $72/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and $2,280/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. That is a $2,208 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Estimated annual total: $72 (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs $2,280 (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV saves you roughly $2,208 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV will save you roughly $2,208 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport is the cheapest at $58,440 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV by $550.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the largest boot at 494L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV makes the most power at 221kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs