Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota Tundra
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 29 Oct 2026, price 29 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
No price
- cannot be matched: Keyless Entry, Push-Button Start, Wireless Phone Charging and 3 more not offered
$155,990RRP
- with the Mitsubishi Triton's standard kit: $155,990 (nothing to add)
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Mitsubishi Triton & Toyota Tundra
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
The Toyota Tundra carries an ANCAP safety grading, which is not a star rating. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.
Recalls on our record
Mitsubishi Triton
- REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
- REC-001049 · published 6 May 2019The rivets for the side step cover may corrode and fracture, especially if usage involves exposure to salt or anti-freeze agent.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
- REC-001032 · published 29 Jun 2016The turn signal and lighting switch connector terminals may become worn during switch operation due to insufficient rigidity.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- 3 more on the model page.
Toyota Tundra
- REC-006666 · published 17 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, vehicles equipped with a towing converter relay may have insufficient insulation on a wire within the relay assembly.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
- REC-006350 · published 23 May 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, moisture may enter the internal circuit board of the reverse lamps over time.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2024
- REC-005908 · published 27 Feb 2024Due to a design issue, the transmission control module may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2024
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Triton features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Tundra gets a 14-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Toyota Tundra counters with wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and JBL audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Triton gets cloth upholstery while the Toyota Tundra offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Mitsubishi Triton and 2-zone in the Toyota Tundra.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.
The Toyota Tundra responds with a Petrol making 326kW and 790Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.
The Toyota Tundra has the clear power advantage at 326kW vs 150kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Toyota Tundra is 4.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 635mm shorter than the Toyota Tundra at 5,955mm (3,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Tundra generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Toyota Tundra leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m to 14.6m
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 14.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,195/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $3,249/year for the Toyota Tundra. That is a $1,054 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Tundra). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota Tundra if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Mitsubishi Triton: Top CarSorted Score, 72 vs 60
The Mitsubishi Triton comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (72 vs 60), taking 2 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 33), performance (Toyota Tundra ahead by 30), value (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 26). The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $1,054 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota Tundra?
The Toyota Tundra is the cheapest at $155,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mitsubishi Triton holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. , so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota Tundra has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota Tundra makes the most power at 326kW. The Toyota Tundra is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
