CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord F-150 vs Toyota Tundra
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford F-150 vs Toyota Tundra

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordToyota
Price (RRP)$114,950$155,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power298kW326kW
0-100 km/h7.3s
Fuel Economy13.4 L/100km11.4 L/100km
Towing4,500kg4,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Ford F-150 & Toyota Tundra

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford F-150 starts from $114,950 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Tundra opens at $155,990. That makes the Ford F-150 the more affordable entry point by $41,040.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $126,445 and $171,589 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota Tundra by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford F-150 features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 12-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Tundra gets a 14-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford F-150 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota Tundra. The Toyota Tundra counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and JBL audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford F-150 gets cloth upholstery while the Toyota Tundra offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Ford F-150 uses a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) producing 298kW and 678Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Toyota Tundra responds with a Petrol making 326kW and 790Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.

The Toyota Tundra has the clear power advantage at 326kW vs 298kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford F-150 measures 6,208mm long on a 3,997mm wheelbase, 253mm longer than the Toyota Tundra at 5,955mm (3,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford F-150 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota Tundra leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 4,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.6m to 15.6m

TightestToyota Tundra LimitedTightest turn at 14.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota Tundra Limited
14.6mTighter
Best
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab LWB
15.6m
Worst
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab LWB
15.6m · Large

Based on 15.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Tundra Limited
14.6m · Large

Based on 14.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota TundraTightest turn at 14.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford F-15015.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Toyota TundraTightest14.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,819/year for the Ford F-150 and $3,249/year for the Toyota Tundra. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Tundra.

Estimated annual total: $3,819 (Ford F-150) vs $3,249 (Toyota Tundra). The Toyota Tundra saves you roughly $570 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford F-150) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Tundra). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford F-150 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Tundra if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Tundra takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Toyota Tundra will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford F-150 and Toyota Tundra?

The Ford F-150 is the cheapest at $114,950 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Tundra by $41,040.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Tundra uses the least fuel at 11.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Ford F-150 and Toyota Tundra carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford F-150 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Tundra makes the most power at 326kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia