Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mitsubishi Triton
From $43,690
Ute
Diesel
Diesel
150kW
7.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Toyota LandCruiser 70
From $65,690
Ute
Diesel
Diesel
150kW
9.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Track the Mitsubishi Triton & Toyota LandCruiser 70
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mitsubishi Triton starts from $43,690 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $65,690. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $22,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,059 and $72,259 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Triton by roughly $2,990 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Triton features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.
The Mitsubishi Triton stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.
Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi Triton is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 85mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 5,235mm (3,180mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m to 14.4m
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 14.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $2,736/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $598 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.
Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Mitsubishi Triton) vs $2,736 (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Mitsubishi Triton saves you roughly $598 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Triton takes 4 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $598 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota LandCruiser 70?
The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $22,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
