Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mitsubishi Triton starts from $43,690 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $65,690. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $22,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,059 and $72,259 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Triton by roughly $4,705 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota LandCruiser 70 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota LandCruiser 70 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Mitsubishi Triton.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Triton and 2 in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Triton features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.
The Mitsubishi Triton stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 151kW and 430Nm, paired to a manual driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the clear power advantage at 151kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi Triton is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 330mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,990mm (3,085mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Triton generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.4m
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $3,050/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $941 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.
Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Mitsubishi Triton) vs $3,050 (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Mitsubishi Triton saves you roughly $941 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Triton takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $941 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota LandCruiser 70?
The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $22,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota LandCruiser 70 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 makes the most power at 151kW. The Mitsubishi Triton is quickest to 100km/h in 11.3s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
