Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 29 Oct 2026, price 29 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
No price
- cannot be matched: Keyless Entry and Push-Button Start not offered
$75,600RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Mitsubishi Triton & Toyota LandCruiser 70
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP's published record does not give the Toyota LandCruiser 70 a rating. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.
Recalls on our record
Mitsubishi Triton
- REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
- REC-001049 · published 6 May 2019The rivets for the side step cover may corrode and fracture, especially if usage involves exposure to salt or anti-freeze agent.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
- REC-001032 · published 29 Jun 2016The turn signal and lighting switch connector terminals may become worn during switch operation due to insufficient rigidity.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- 3 more on the model page.
Toyota LandCruiser 70
- REC-005079 · published 5 Jul 2016The front fender bracket may fail causing the front fender to become loose.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Triton features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mitsubishi Triton stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. The Toyota LandCruiser 70 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Triton uses a Diesel producing 150kW and 470Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.3 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.
Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mitsubishi Triton is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Triton measures 5,320mm long on a 3,130mm wheelbase, 455mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Triton generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m to 12.6m
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,195/year for the Mitsubishi Triton and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $826 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Mitsubishi Triton: Top CarSorted Score, 72 vs 60
The Mitsubishi Triton comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (72 vs 60), taking 3 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 29), fuel economy (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 26), practicality (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 7). The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $826 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota LandCruiser 70?
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mitsubishi Triton holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. ANCAP's published record does not give a rating to Toyota LandCruiser 70, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
