CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan X-Trail vs Chery C5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan X-Trail vs Chery C5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Nissan X-Trail: we're still completing kerb weight, 0-100km/h and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecNissanChery
Price (RRP)$28,490$27,500
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power102kW108kW
0-100 km/h8.5s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space370L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Nissan X-Trail & Chery C5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Nissan X-Trail starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Chery C5 opens at $27,500. That makes the Chery C5 the more affordable entry point by $990.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $30,250 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery C5 by roughly $2,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Chery C5 counters with Apple CarPlay that the Nissan X-Trail does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Nissan X-Trail uses a Petrol producing 102kW and 198Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a 2WD layout.

The Chery C5 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a 6-speed dual clutch driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Chery C5 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 102kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan X-Trail measures 4,635mm long on a 2,630mm wheelbase, 284mm longer than the Chery C5 at 4,351mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan X-Trail generally means more rear legroom.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

TightestNissan X-Trail ST 2.0 2WD ManualTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan X-Trail ST 2.0 2WD Manual
11.0mTighter
Best
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m
Worst
Nissan X-Trail ST 2.0 2WD Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan X-TrailTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan X-TrailTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Chery C511.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Nissan X-Trail and $1,967/year for the Chery C5. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Chery C5.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Nissan X-Trail) vs $1,967 (Chery C5). The Chery C5 saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Nissan X-Trail) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery C5). The Chery C5 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 6yr (Nissan X-Trail)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery C5 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery C5 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery C5 will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. The Chery C5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan X-Trail and Chery C5?

The Chery C5 is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan X-Trail by $990.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery C5 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery C5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan X-Trail has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery C5 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery C5 makes the most power at 108kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs