Omoda 5 vs Ford Everest
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Omoda 5 & Ford Everest
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Omoda 5 and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Omoda 5 and 86% for the Ford Everest.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Omoda 5.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Omoda 5 and 9 in the Ford Everest.
Feature Showdown
The Omoda 5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Omoda 5 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Omoda 5 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Ford Everest offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Omoda 5 and 2-zone in the Ford Everest.
Drivetrain
The Omoda 5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Everest is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Omoda 5 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 671mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Omoda 5 and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Omoda 5 a 99L advantage.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.8m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Omoda 5 and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the Omoda 5.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Omoda 5) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Omoda 5 saves you roughly $85 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). The Omoda 5 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Omoda 5)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Omoda 5 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Omoda 5 and Ford Everest trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Omoda 5 will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Omoda 5 has a clear edge. The Omoda 5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Omoda 5 and Ford Everest?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Omoda 5 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Omoda 5 and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Omoda 5 has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Omoda 5 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW. The Ford Everest is quickest to 100km/h in 10.1s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
