CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Peugeot 3008 vs Volvo XC40
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Peugeot 3008 vs Volvo XC40

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Peugeot 3008Allure Hybrid10?02
Volvo XC40Plus B48?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecPeugeotVolvo
Price (RRP)$52,990$54,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$52,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

$54,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power107kW145kW
0-100 km/h10.2s8.5s
Fuel Economy4.9 L/100km7.3 L/100km
Boot (seats up)520L460L
Towing1,200kg2,100kg
Warranty5yr / 200k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 StarsNo data

Track the Peugeot 3008 & Volvo XC40

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Peugeot 3008 starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC40 opens at $54,990. That makes the Peugeot 3008 the more affordable entry point by $2,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $60,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 3008 by roughly $3,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Peugeot 3008

  • REC-006738 · published 29 Sep 2026Due to a software issue, the interior door handles may deactivate unexpectedly while the engine is running.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
  • REC-006583 · published 7 Apr 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the ball joint brackets mounting bolts on the front lower suspension arm may break.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
  • REC-006421 · published 4 Sep 2025Due to a software issue, the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2022
  • 8 more on the model page.

Volvo XC40

  • REC-006368 · published 23 Jun 2025Due to a software issue, there is a risk that the vehicle’s braking performance may be temporarily disabled if the car has been coasting downhill for at least 1 minute and 30 seconds in ‘B’ mode (in the plug-in hybrid cars) or One Pedal Drive (in the pure electric cars).Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2025
  • REC-006080 · published 24 Sep 2024Due to a manufacturing defect, the front passenger seat mounting bolts may not have been tightened according to specifications and could become loose or detach.Year range on the notice: 2023
  • REC-005877 · published 24 Jan 2024Due to a software issue, the left turn indicator lamp may not illuminate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2023
  • 3 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Peugeot 3008 features a 21-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC40 counters with head-up display, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Peugeot 3008 gets cloth upholstery while the Volvo XC40 offers textile/leather blend.

Drivetrain

The Peugeot 3008 uses a Hybrid producing 107kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds.

The Volvo XC40 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid making 145kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Volvo XC40 has the clear power advantage at 145kW vs 107kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volvo XC40 is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Peugeot 3008 measures 4,542mm long on a 2,730mm wheelbase, 102mm longer than the Volvo XC40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 3008 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 520L in the Peugeot 3008 and 460L in the Volvo XC40, giving the Peugeot 3008 a 60L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo XC40 leads with a 2,100kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 900kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.4m

TightestVolvo XC40 Plus B4Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0mTighter
Best
Peugeot 3008 Allure Hybrid
11.4m
Worst
Peugeot 3008 Allure Hybrid
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo XC40Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Peugeot 300811.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo XC40Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Peugeot 3008 and $2,081/year for the Volvo XC40. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 3008.

Warranty: 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 3008) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Peugeot 3008 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Peugeot 3008: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 70

The Peugeot 3008 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 70), taking 3 of 6 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Peugeot 3008 ahead by 22), safety (Peugeot 3008 ahead by 15), performance (Volvo XC40 ahead by 10). The Peugeot 3008 will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 3008 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Peugeot 3008 and Volvo XC40?

The Peugeot 3008 is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo XC40 by $2,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 3008 uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Peugeot 3008 holds a 4-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo XC40, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 3008 has the largest boot at 520L with the seats up (1,480L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo XC40 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo XC40 makes the most power at 145kW. The Volvo XC40 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars