CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ssangyong Actyon Sports vs Mazda BT-50
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ssangyong Actyon Sports vs Mazda BT-50

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 10 Sep 2026, price 4 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Ssangyong Actyon SportsTradie 4x2 Automatic0?012
Mazda BT-50XS SC 4x26?06

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Ssangyong Actyon Sports: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and turning circle.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecSsangyongMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$38,400
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no option data for this car

$38,400RRP

  • with the Ssangyong Actyon Sports's standard kit: $38,400 (nothing to add)

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power104kW120kW
Fuel Economy8.7 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Towing2,300kg3,500kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Ssangyong Actyon Sports & Mazda BT-50

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Ssangyong Actyon Sports

  • REC-003632 · published 11 May 2015Due to a manufacturing issue, the front suspension lower ball joints may be damaged under extreme driving conditions.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-003302 · published 7 Jul 2010The rear reflector may not meet the required manufacturing standard.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range

Mazda BT-50

  • REC-006284 · published 3 Mar 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left leaf spring bracket may have been insufficiently welded and could crack resulting in a loss of vehicle control.Year range on the notice: 2024
  • REC-005070 · published 10 Mar 2022Due to a manufacturing issue, the transfer case blanking plug may not have been installed correctly during production.Year range on the notice: 2021
  • REC-000899 · published 20 Jan 2021The rear seat belt pretensioner connector lock, may not have been installed correctly during vehicle assembly and will not tension properly.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
  • 11 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda BT-50 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ssangyong Actyon Sports uses a 2.0L DOHC in-line 4 common-rail turbo-diesel producing 104kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic with steering wheel sports shift to a RWD layout.

The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Mazda BT-50 has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 104kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ssangyong Actyon Sports measures 4,965mm long on a 3,060mm wheelbase, 355mm shorter than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda BT-50 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,300kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m diameter

Large

Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m
←
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Mazda BT-50 Turning circle · Ø 12.5 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the Ssangyong Actyon Sports and $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Ssangyong Actyon Sports) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). The Mazda BT-50 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ssangyong Actyon Sports if: You or prefer Ssangyong's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (49 vs 70). The Ssangyong Actyon Sports and Mazda BT-50 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. The Mazda BT-50 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ssangyong Actyon Sports and Mazda BT-50?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $38,400 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Mazda BT-50 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Ssangyong Actyon Sports, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda BT-50 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda BT-50 makes the most power at 120kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia