Suzuki e Vitara vs Toyota C-HR
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki e Vitara starts from $36,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $38,990. That makes the Suzuki e Vitara the more affordable entry point by $2,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,689 and $42,889 respectively.
The Suzuki e Vitara qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota C-HR, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki e Vitara by roughly $3,100 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Suzuki e Vitara and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 77% for the Suzuki e Vitara and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota C-HR packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki e Vitara.
Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Suzuki e Vitara stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki e Vitara uses a Electric Motor producing 128kW and 189Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 112kW and 188Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.
The Suzuki e Vitara has the clear power advantage at 128kW vs 112kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota C-HR is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki e Vitara measures 4,275mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 85mm shorter than the Toyota C-HR at 4,360mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Suzuki e Vitara generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 306L in the Suzuki e Vitara and 318L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Toyota C-HR a 12L advantage.
For towing, the Toyota C-HR leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.4m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $720/year for the Suzuki e Vitara and $1,340/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $620 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki e Vitara.
Estimated annual total: $720 (Suzuki e Vitara) vs $1,340 (Toyota C-HR). The Suzuki e Vitara saves you roughly $620 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Suzuki e Vitara) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki e Vitara if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Toyota C-HR takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki e Vitara will save you roughly $620 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki e Vitara and Toyota C-HR?
The Suzuki e Vitara is the cheapest at $36,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $2,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki e Vitara and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota C-HR has the largest boot at 318L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota C-HR has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Suzuki e Vitara makes the most power at 128kW. The Toyota C-HR is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
