Suzuki e Vitara vs Toyota C-HR
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 1 Sep 2026, price 24 Jun 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
Track the Suzuki e Vitara & Toyota C-HR
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki e Vitara starts from $42,700 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Suzuki e Vitara the more affordable entry point by $4,240.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,970 and $51,634 respectively.
The Suzuki e Vitara currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota C-HR does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.
Safety Rundown
The Toyota C-HR holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Suzuki e Vitara. Adult occupant protection scored 77% for the Suzuki e Vitara and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Toyota C-HR, against 0 on the Suzuki e Vitara.
Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.
Recalls on our record
Suzuki e Vitara
None open on our record
Toyota C-HR
- REC-005804 · published 23 Oct 2023The internal components of the fuel pump may wear and fracture the welded area of the fuel pump, which could lead to a fuel leak in the engine compartment.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2023
- REC-005068 · published 10 Mar 2022The vehicle's front radar sensor which supports certain driver assistance features, including the Pre-Collision System (PCS) may not have been calibrated during vehicle manufacture.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
- REC-001645 · published 20 Jun 2021The internal components of the fuel pump may wear and fracture the welded area of the fuel pump, which could lead to a fuel leak in the engine compartment.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2021
- 1 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
46kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 129kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 129kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Suzuki e Vitara stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki e Vitara uses a Electric Motor producing 106kW and 193Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Suzuki e Vitara has the clear power advantage at 106kW vs 103kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Suzuki e Vitara is 1.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki e Vitara measures 4,275mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 87mm shorter than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Suzuki e Vitara generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 306L in the Suzuki e Vitara and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Toyota C-HR a 82L advantage.
For towing, the Suzuki e Vitara leads with a 750kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 25kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.4m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Suzuki e Vitara) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki e Vitara if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Toyota C-HR: Top CarSorted Score, 81 vs 62, but the Suzuki e Vitara is $4,240 cheaper
The Toyota C-HR comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (81 vs 62), taking 2 of 7 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Toyota C-HR ahead by 13), value (Toyota C-HR ahead by 8), reliability (Toyota C-HR ahead by 4). If boot space matters, the Toyota C-HR has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki e Vitara and Toyota C-HR?
The Suzuki e Vitara is the cheapest at $42,700 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $4,240.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Toyota C-HR has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota C-HR has the largest boot at 388L with the seats up.
Which is the most powerful?
The Suzuki e Vitara makes the most power at 106kW. The Suzuki e Vitara is quickest to 100km/h in 9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
