Suzuki S-Cross vs KGM Actyon
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Suzuki S-Cross & KGM Actyon
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki S-Cross starts from $43,490 before on-road costs, while the KGM Actyon opens at $44,500. That makes the Suzuki S-Cross the more affordable entry point by $1,010.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,839 and $48,950 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki S-Cross by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki S-Cross features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the KGM Actyon gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Suzuki S-Cross stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that you will not find on the KGM Actyon. The KGM Actyon counters with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Suzuki S-Cross gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Actyon offers leather.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki S-Cross uses a Petrol producing 103kW and 220Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The KGM Actyon responds with a Turbo GDi making 120kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.5 seconds.
The KGM Actyon has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki S-Cross is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki S-Cross measures 4,305mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 435mm shorter than the KGM Actyon at 4,740mm (2,680mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Actyon generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross and 668L in the KGM Actyon, giving the KGM Actyon a 238L advantage.
For towing, the KGM Actyon leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 10.8m
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Suzuki S-Cross and $2,166/year for the KGM Actyon. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.
Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Suzuki S-Cross) vs $2,166 (KGM Actyon). The Suzuki S-Cross saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Actyon). The KGM Actyon has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the KGM Actyon if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Suzuki S-Cross and KGM Actyon trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Actyon has a clear edge. The KGM Actyon adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki S-Cross and KGM Actyon?
The Suzuki S-Cross is the cheapest at $43,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Actyon by $1,010.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki S-Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The KGM Actyon has the largest boot at 668L.
Which can tow the most?
The Suzuki S-Cross has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The KGM Actyon has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The KGM Actyon makes the most power at 120kW. The Suzuki S-Cross is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!









