CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Swift vs Mahindra XUV 3XO
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Swift vs Mahindra XUV 3XO

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiMahindra
Price (RRP)$16,990$21,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power70kW82kW
0-100 km/h10.4s
Fuel Economy5.5 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space210L364L
Warranty3yr / 100k km7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Suzuki Swift & Mahindra XUV 3XO

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Swift starts from $16,990 before on-road costs, while the Mahindra XUV 3XO opens at $21,800. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $4,810.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $18,689 and $23,980 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO counters with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that the Suzuki Swift does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Swift uses a Petrol producing 70kW and 130Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO responds with a Petrol making 82kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.4 seconds.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the clear power advantage at 82kW vs 70kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Swift measures 3,850mm long on a 2,430mm wheelbase, 140mm shorter than the Mahindra XUV 3XO at 3,990mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mahindra XUV 3XO generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 210L in the Suzuki Swift and 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO, giving the Mahindra XUV 3XO a 154L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.6m to 10.6m

TightestSuzuki Swift GA ManualTightest turn at 9.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Swift GA Manual
9.6mTighter
Best
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m
Worst
Suzuki Swift GA Manual
9.6m · Excellent

Based on 9.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki SwiftTightest turn at 9.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki SwiftTightest9.6 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Mahindra XUV 3XO10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Suzuki Swift and $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.

Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Suzuki Swift) vs $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO). The Suzuki Swift saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift) vs 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO). The Mahindra XUV 3XO has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mahindra XUV 3XO takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mahindra XUV 3XO has a clear edge. The Mahindra XUV 3XO adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Swift and Mahindra XUV 3XO?

The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $16,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mahindra XUV 3XO by $4,810.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki Swift all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the largest boot at 364L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO makes the most power at 82kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best mid-size SUVs