CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota bZ4X vs Mazda CX-80
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota bZ4X vs Mazda CX-80

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaMazda
Price (RRP)$59,990$64,490
Range (WLTP)516km
Battery71.4 kWh
Power150kW209kW
0-100 km/h7.5s9s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min
Fuel Economy7.1 L/100km
Boot Space500L550L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Toyota bZ4X starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-80 opens at $64,490. That makes the Toyota bZ4X the more affordable entry point by $4,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $70,939 respectively.

The Toyota bZ4X qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-80, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-80 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the Toyota bZ4X and 92% for the Mazda CX-80.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-80 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota bZ4X.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Toyota bZ4X and 6 in the Mazda CX-80.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Toyota bZ4X uses a Electric producing 150kW and 266Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 responds with a Petrol making 209kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota bZ4X is 1.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota bZ4X measures 4,690mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 300mm shorter than the Mazda CX-80 at 4,990mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 500L in the Toyota bZ4X and 550L in the Mazda CX-80, giving the Mazda CX-80 a 50L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.8m

Toyota bZ4X FWD
11.2mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.8m
Worst
Toyota bZ4X
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-80
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota bZ4X) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota bZ4X if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-80 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-80 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-80?

The Toyota bZ4X is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $4,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-80 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-80 has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Toyota bZ4X is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs