CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota Coaster vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota Coaster vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Toyota Coaster: we're still completing 0-100km/h, ground clearance, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecToyotaMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$138,080$76,900
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power110kW150kW
0-100 km/h7.3s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km
Boot Space455L
Towing1,400kg1,800kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Toyota Coaster & Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota Coaster starts from $138,080 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz C-Class opens at $76,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz C-Class the more affordable entry point by $61,180.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $151,888 and $84,590 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota Coaster features a 6.1-inch touchscreen, while the Mercedes-Benz C-Class gets a 11.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof and ambient lighting that the Toyota Coaster does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota Coaster uses a 2.8L turbo-diesel (1GD-FTV, 4-cyl) producing 110kW and 420Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic with sequential shift to a RWD layout.

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class responds with a Petrol making 150kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota Coaster measures 6,990mm long on a 3,935mm wheelbase, 2239mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz C-Class at 4,751mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Coaster generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,400kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 13.0m

TightestMercedes-Benz C-Class C200Tightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mercedes-Benz C-Class C200
11.1mTighter
Best
Toyota Coaster Standard
13.0m
Worst
Toyota Coaster Standard
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz C-Class C200
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMercedes-Benz C-ClassTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota Coaster13.0 m
Large△ 3-point
Mercedes-Benz C-ClassTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years (Toyota Coaster) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz C-Class). The Mercedes-Benz C-Class has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota Coaster if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz C-Class if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class takes 4 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota Coaster and Mercedes-Benz C-Class?

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class is the cheapest at $76,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Coaster by $61,180.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz C-Class all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class makes the most power at 150kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Buss · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars