CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Toyota HiLux vs Volvo C70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota HiLux vs Volvo C70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 12 Aug 2026, price 6 Sep 2026

Specifications in progress

Volvo C70: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, warranty and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecToyotaVolvo
Price (RRP)$33,990TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power150kW125kW
0-100 km/h10.2s10s
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km9.6 L/100km
Boot (seats up)—404L
Towing2,900kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Toyota HiLux & Volvo C70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota HiLux stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Volvo C70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota HiLux uses a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel producing 150kW and 420Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds.

The Volvo C70 lines up making 125kW and 230Nm, paired to a 5-speed geartronic automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10 seconds.

The Toyota HiLux has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 125kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Volvo C70 is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota HiLux measures 5,380mm long on a 3,085mm wheelbase, 798mm longer than the Volvo C70 at 4,582mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota HiLux generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota HiLux leads with a 2,900kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.8m

TightestToyota HiLux WorkMate 4x2 Single Cab ManualTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota HiLux WorkMate 4x2 Single Cab Manual
10.8mTighter
Best
Volvo C70 2.4i Geartronic
11.8m
Worst
Toyota HiLux WorkMate 4x2 Single Cab Manual
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo C70 2.4i Geartronic
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota HiLuxTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota HiLuxTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Volvo C7011.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Toyota HiLux and $2,736/year for the Volvo C70. That is a $655 annual difference in favour of the Toyota HiLux.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota HiLux if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo C70 if: You or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Toyota HiLux: Top CarSorted Score, 67 vs 35

The Toyota HiLux comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (67 vs 35), taking 3 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Toyota HiLux ahead by 55), value (Toyota HiLux ahead by 41), technology (Toyota HiLux ahead by 33). The Toyota HiLux will save you roughly $655 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota HiLux and Volvo C70?

The Toyota HiLux is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota HiLux uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Toyota HiLux holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo C70, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota HiLux has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,900kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota HiLux makes the most power at 150kW. The Volvo C70 is quickest to 100km/h in 10s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Cab Chassiss · All Convertibles · Best family cars