Toyota LandCruiser Prado vs Mazda CX-80
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Toyota LandCruiser Prado
From $73,200
SUV
2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active
150kW
10.6 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
390L
Mazda CX-80
From $64,490
SUV
Petrol
209kW
7.1 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
550L
Price Breakdown
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado starts from $73,200 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-80 opens at $64,490. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $8,710.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $80,520 and $70,939 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-80 by roughly $4,985 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and Mazda CX-80 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and 92% for the Mazda CX-80.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-80 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota LandCruiser Prado.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and 6 in the Mazda CX-80.
Feature Showdown
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-80 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-80 counters with power tailgate that the Toyota LandCruiser Prado does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado uses a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active producing 150kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.6 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 responds with a Petrol making 209kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-80 is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado measures 4,990mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, matching the Mazda CX-80 at 4,990mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 390L in the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and 550L in the Mazda CX-80, giving the Mazda CX-80 a 160L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser Prado leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and $2,024/year for the Mazda CX-80. That is a $997 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-80.
Estimated annual total: $3,021 (Toyota LandCruiser Prado) vs $2,024 (Mazda CX-80). The Mazda CX-80 saves you roughly $997 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser Prado) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser Prado if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-80 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-80 will save you roughly $997 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-80 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser Prado and Mazda CX-80?
The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $64,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser Prado by $8,710.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota LandCruiser Prado and Mazda CX-80 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-80 has the largest boot at 550L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Mazda CX-80 is quickest to 100km/h in 9s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
