Volkswagen Caddy vs Ford Everest
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Volkswagen Caddy
From $57,600
People Mover
Petrol
Petrol I4 Turbo TSI
84kW
6.7 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
446L
Ford Everest
From $59,490
SUV
Diesel
Diesel Bi-Turbo
154kW
7.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
259L
Volkswagen Caddy: we're still completing kerb weight, 0-100km/h and ground clearance.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Volkswagen Caddy & Ford Everest
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Volkswagen Caddy starts from $57,600 before on-road costs, while the Ford Everest opens at $59,490. That makes the Volkswagen Caddy the more affordable entry point by $1,890.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $63,360 and $65,439 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Volkswagen Caddy and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 84% for the Volkswagen Caddy and 86% for the Ford Everest.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Volkswagen Caddy.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Volkswagen Caddy and 9 in the Ford Everest.
Feature Showdown
The Volkswagen Caddy features a 8.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Volkswagen Caddy stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Volkswagen Caddy gets cloth (double grid) upholstery while the Ford Everest offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Volkswagen Caddy uses a Petrol I4 Turbo TSI producing 84kW and 220Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual clutch (dsg) to a FWD layout.
The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 84kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Volkswagen Caddy measures 4,853mm long on a 2,970mm wheelbase, 125mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen Caddy generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 446L in the Volkswagen Caddy and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Volkswagen Caddy a 187L advantage. The Volkswagen Caddy seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.1m
Based on 12.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Volkswagen Caddy and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Caddy.
Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Volkswagen Caddy) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Volkswagen Caddy saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years (Volkswagen Caddy) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Volkswagen Caddy if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Volkswagen Caddy takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen Caddy will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Caddy has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Volkswagen Caddy and Ford Everest?
The Volkswagen Caddy is the cheapest at $57,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $1,890.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volkswagen Caddy uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Caddy and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volkswagen Caddy has the largest boot at 446L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
