Volvo XC40 vs Peugeot 3008
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Volvo XC40
From $54,990
SUV
Petrol
2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid
145kW
7.3 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
460L
Peugeot 3008
From $52,990
SUV
Hybrid
Hybrid
107kW
4.9 L/100km
4★ ANCAP
520L
Track the Volvo XC40 & Peugeot 3008
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Volvo XC40 starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 3008 opens at $52,990. That makes the Peugeot 3008 the more affordable entry point by $2,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $58,289 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 3008 by roughly $3,420 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Volvo XC40 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Peugeot 3008.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Peugeot 3008 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Volvo XC40.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Volvo XC40 and 6 in the Peugeot 3008.
Feature Showdown
The Volvo XC40 features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 3008 gets a 21-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Volvo XC40 stands out with head-up display, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Peugeot 3008. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Volvo XC40 gets textile/leather blend upholstery while the Peugeot 3008 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Volvo XC40 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid producing 145kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Peugeot 3008 responds with a Hybrid making 107kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Volvo XC40 has the clear power advantage at 145kW vs 107kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo XC40 is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Volvo XC40 measures 4,440mm long on a 2,702mm wheelbase, 102mm shorter than the Peugeot 3008 at 4,542mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 3008 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 460L in the Volvo XC40 and 520L in the Peugeot 3008, giving the Peugeot 3008 a 60L advantage.
For towing, the Volvo XC40 leads with a 2,100kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 900kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.4m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Volvo XC40 and $1,397/year for the Peugeot 3008. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 3008.
Estimated annual total: $2,081 (Volvo XC40) vs $1,397 (Peugeot 3008). The Peugeot 3008 saves you roughly $684 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 3008). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Peugeot 3008 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Volvo XC40 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Peugeot 3008 will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 3008 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Volvo XC40 and Peugeot 3008?
The Peugeot 3008 is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo XC40 by $2,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Peugeot 3008 uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Volvo XC40 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Peugeot 3008 has the largest boot at 520L.
Which can tow the most?
The Volvo XC40 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,100kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Volvo XC40 makes the most power at 145kW. The Volvo XC40 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
