KGM Rexton vs Skoda Kodiaq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The KGM Rexton starts from $50,000 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. That makes the KGM Rexton the more affordable entry point by $4,990.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,000 and $60,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kodiaq by roughly $3,280 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the KGM Rexton and Skoda Kodiaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the KGM Rexton and 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq.
Feature Showdown
The KGM Rexton features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Rexton stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. The Skoda Kodiaq counters with heated front seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The KGM Rexton uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 149kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.
The KGM Rexton has the clear power advantage at 149kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kodiaq is 2.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The KGM Rexton measures 4,850mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 92mm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Rexton generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 236L in the KGM Rexton and 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq, giving the Skoda Kodiaq a 34L advantage.
For towing, the KGM Rexton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton and $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq. That is a $656 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kodiaq.
Estimated annual total: $2,480 (KGM Rexton) vs $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq saves you roughly $656 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the KGM Rexton if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The KGM Rexton and Skoda Kodiaq trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Skoda Kodiaq will save you roughly $656 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Kodiaq has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, KGM Rexton and Skoda Kodiaq?
The KGM Rexton is the cheapest at $50,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $4,990.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — KGM Rexton and Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the largest boot at 270L.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Rexton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The KGM Rexton makes the most power at 149kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
