Mazda CX-80 vs Alfa Romeo Tonale
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale opens at $56,900. That makes the Alfa Romeo Tonale the more affordable entry point by $7,590.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $62,590 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Alfa Romeo Tonale by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-80 and Alfa Romeo Tonale hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 84% for the Alfa Romeo Tonale.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Alfa Romeo Tonale packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mazda CX-80.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 6 in the Alfa Romeo Tonale.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Alfa Romeo Tonale counters with ambient lighting that the Mazda CX-80 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The Alfa Romeo Tonale responds with a Petrol MHEV making 118kW and 240Nm, paired to a dct driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.8 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 118kW. In the real-world sprint, the Alfa Romeo Tonale is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 462mm longer than the Alfa Romeo Tonale at 4,528mm (2,636mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 500L in the Alfa Romeo Tonale, giving the Alfa Romeo Tonale a 242L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,250kg. That 1,250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $1,881/year for the Alfa Romeo Tonale. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Alfa Romeo Tonale.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $1,881 (Alfa Romeo Tonale). The Alfa Romeo Tonale saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Tonale). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Alfa Romeo Tonale if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Alfa Romeo Tonale takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Alfa Romeo Tonale will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Alfa Romeo Tonale has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Alfa Romeo Tonale?
The Alfa Romeo Tonale is the cheapest at $56,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $7,590.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Alfa Romeo Tonale uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and Alfa Romeo Tonale all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Alfa Romeo Tonale has the largest boot at 500L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Alfa Romeo Tonale is quickest to 100km/h in 8.8s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
