CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Megane E-Tech vs Skoda Kodiaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Megane E-Tech vs Skoda Kodiaq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultSkoda
Price (RRP)$54,990$54,990
Range (WLTP)440km
Battery60 kWh
Power160kW110kW
0-100 km/h7.4s9.1s
Max DC Charge130kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km
Boot Space440L270L
Towing1,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Renault Megane E-Tech starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $60,489 respectively.

The Renault Megane E-Tech qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Skoda Kodiaq, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Renault Megane E-Tech and Skoda Kodiaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Renault Megane E-Tech and 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Renault Megane E-Tech packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Skoda Kodiaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Renault Megane E-Tech and 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq. The Renault Megane E-Tech adds a 360-degree camera that the Skoda Kodiaq misses.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Megane E-Tech features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Renault Megane E-Tech stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, BOSE audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. The Skoda Kodiaq counters with heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Megane E-Tech uses a Electric producing 160kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.

The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The Renault Megane E-Tech has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Renault Megane E-Tech is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Megane E-Tech measures 4,200mm long on a 2,685mm wheelbase, 558mm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the Renault Megane E-Tech and 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq, giving the Renault Megane E-Tech a 170L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.4m

Renault Megane E-Tech Techno
10.8mTighter
Best
Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4m
Worst
Renault Megane E-Tech
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Megane E-Tech) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Megane E-Tech if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Megane E-Tech takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Renault Megane E-Tech has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Megane E-Tech and Skoda Kodiaq?

The Renault Megane E-Tech is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Renault Megane E-Tech and Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Megane E-Tech has the largest boot at 440L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Megane E-Tech makes the most power at 160kW. The Renault Megane E-Tech is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs