CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Abarth 695 vs Mazda 6e
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs Mazda 6e

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 4 Sep 2026, price 21 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Abarth 695Competizione4?08
Mazda 6eGT11?01

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecAbarthMazda
Price (RRP)$37,900$49,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$37,900RRP

  • no option data for this car

$49,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)—560km
Battery—78 kWh
Power132kW190kW
0-100 km/h6.7s—
Max DC Charge—194kW
10-80% Charge Time—24 min
Fuel Economy6 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)185L337L
Towing—1,500kg
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LNoYes (3.5kW)

Track the Abarth 695 & Mazda 6e

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $37,900 before on-road costs, while the Mazda 6e opens at $49,990. That makes the Abarth 695 the more affordable entry point by $12,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,690 and $54,989 respectively.

The Mazda 6e currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Abarth 695 does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Abarth 695

None open on our record

Mazda 6e

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

78kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 15m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 194kW · 0–80%

24 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 194kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mazda 6e gets a 14.6-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Abarth 695 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda 6e. The Mazda 6e counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Mazda 6e offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 695 and 3-zone in the Mazda 6e.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Mazda 6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Mazda 6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 132kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 1264mm shorter than the Mazda 6e at 4,921mm (2,895mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda 6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 337L in the Mazda 6e, giving the Mazda 6e a 152L advantage. The Mazda 6e seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 11.2m

TightestAbarth 695 CompetizioneTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3mTighter
Best
Mazda 6e GT
11.2m
Worst
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda 6e GT
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAbarth 695Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Abarth 695Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Mazda 6e11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda 6e). The Mazda 6e has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda 6e if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Mazda 6e: Top CarSorted Score, 80 vs 63, but the Abarth 695 is $12,090 cheaper

The Mazda 6e comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (80 vs 63), taking 5 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: reliability (Mazda 6e ahead by 23), practicality (Mazda 6e ahead by 21), value (Mazda 6e ahead by 15). If boot space matters, the Mazda 6e has a clear edge. The Mazda 6e adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Mazda 6e?

The Abarth 695 is the cheapest at $37,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda 6e by $12,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Mazda 6e holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Abarth 695, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda 6e has the largest boot at 337L with the seats up (1,074L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda 6e has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda 6e has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda 6e makes the most power at 190kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best electric cars