CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Alfa Romeo Spider vs MG Cyberster
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo Spider vs MG Cyberster

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 1 Oct 2026, price 8 Sep 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Alfa Romeo Spider3.2 JTS V61?011
MG Cyberster77kWh AWD6?06

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Alfa Romeo Spider: we're still completing price, kerb weight, ground clearance and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecAlfa RomeoMG
Price (RRP)TBC$99,900
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no option data for this car

$99,900RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePremium Unleaded PetrolElectric
Range—519km
Battery—77 kWh
Power191kW375kW
0-100 km/h7.2s3.2s
Max DC Charge—144kW
10-80% Charge Time—25 min
Fuel Economy12.2 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)235L249L
Warranty3yr / 100k km10yr / 250k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Alfa Romeo Spider & MG Cyberster

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Alfa Romeo Spider

None open on our record

MG Cyberster

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

74kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 11m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 144kW · 0–80%

31 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 144kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Alfa Romeo Spider stands out with heated front seats and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the MG Cyberster. The MG Cyberster counters with Apple CarPlay and head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo Spider uses a 3.2-litre V6 petrol producing 191kW and 322Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed qtronic automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.2 seconds.

The MG Cyberster responds with a Electric Motor making 375kW and 725Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.2 seconds.

The MG Cyberster has the clear power advantage at 375kW vs 191kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the MG Cyberster is 4.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo Spider measures 4,410mm long on a 2,528mm wheelbase, 125mm shorter than the MG Cyberster at 4,535mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG Cyberster generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 235L in the Alfa Romeo Spider and 249L in the MG Cyberster, giving the MG Cyberster a 14L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7m diameter

Good

Alfa Romeo Spider 3.2 JTS V6
10.7m
←
Alfa Romeo Spider 3.2 JTS V6
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Alfa Romeo Spider Turning circle · Ø 10.7 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.4 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

✓

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

✓

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Alfa Romeo Spider) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG Cyberster). The MG Cyberster has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo Spider if: You or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG Cyberster if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (38 vs 66). The Alfa Romeo Spider and MG Cyberster trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The MG Cyberster adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Spider and MG Cyberster?

The MG Cyberster is the cheapest at $99,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo Spider uses the least fuel at 12.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Alfa Romeo Spider and MG Cyberster carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG Cyberster has the largest boot at 249L with the seats up.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG Cyberster has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG Cyberster makes the most power at 375kW. The MG Cyberster is quickest to 100km/h in 3.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · Best family cars · Best electric cars