CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAlfa Romeo Tonale vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAlfa RomeoFord
Price (RRP)$56,900$59,490
Power118kW154kW
0-100 km/h8.8s10.1s
Fuel Economy5.6 L/100km7.2 L/100km
Boot Space500L259L
Towing1,250kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Alfa Romeo Tonale starts from $56,900 before on-road costs, while the Ford Everest opens at $59,490. That makes the Alfa Romeo Tonale the more affordable entry point by $2,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $62,590 and $65,439 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Alfa Romeo Tonale by roughly $2,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Alfa Romeo Tonale and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 84% for the Alfa Romeo Tonale and 86% for the Ford Everest.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Alfa Romeo Tonale and 9 in the Ford Everest.

Feature Showdown

The Alfa Romeo Tonale features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Alfa Romeo Tonale stands out with power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo Tonale uses a Petrol MHEV producing 118kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a dct to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.8 seconds.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 118kW. In the real-world sprint, the Alfa Romeo Tonale is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo Tonale measures 4,528mm long on a 2,636mm wheelbase, 450mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 500L in the Alfa Romeo Tonale and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Alfa Romeo Tonale a 241L advantage.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,250kg. That 2,250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.8m

Alfa Romeo Tonale MHEV
11.2mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m
Worst
Alfa Romeo Tonale
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,596/year for the Alfa Romeo Tonale and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Alfa Romeo Tonale.

Estimated annual total: $1,596 (Alfa Romeo Tonale) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Alfa Romeo Tonale saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Tonale) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo Tonale if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Alfa Romeo Tonale takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Alfa Romeo Tonale will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Alfa Romeo Tonale has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Tonale and Ford Everest?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is the cheapest at $56,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $2,590.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Alfa Romeo Tonale and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale has the largest boot at 500L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW. The Alfa Romeo Tonale is quickest to 100km/h in 8.8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs